Công ty có hỗ trợ các sáng kiến bảo vệ môi trường của cộng đồng địa phương không?

... liable for environmental damages, when the Aberjona River valley was . ... The A Civil Action - The Woburn Toxic Trial project website has not been significantly ... Nov 8, 2018 ... After officials repeatedly dismissed claims that Flint's water ... Not surprisingly, the Flint River is rumored to have caught fire—twice. Three years ago this week, the Environmental Protection Agency announced it would not require General Electric to continue dredging toxic PCBs from the ... Feb 26, 2025 ... ... not install a required air pollution control device. Burden of Proof ... finding the companies or persons responsible for the contamination ... Apr 14, 2025 ... ... companies made the toxic chemicals or firefighting foam responsible for pollution. ... claims to those not involving AFFF contamination. They told us 200,000 gallons of sewage was dumped into our river causing us not to row because the bacteria level was too high. Upset, I went home and did some ... ... claims associated with oil pollution from designated covered facilities. The requirement to provide the information is mandatory. No information submitted ... Apr 15, 2010 ... 'During the winter there may well be a high agricultural input of phosphorus, but this is not the critical period for biology and in many cases ... Nov 18, 2024 ... PepsiCo “did not pollute the Buffalo River ... environmental groups, companies should be financially responsible for managing the pollution they ... Furthermore, the County expressly disclaims any responsibility to defend or indemnify you against claims ... not responsible for the content of any pages of such ...