Công ty có cơ chế khen thưởng và kỷ luật liên quan đến công tác bảo vệ môi trường không?

Question: The company claims it is not responsible for the pollution in the river. - contaminant; contamination; purity; hygiene. The past year has been a time of change for our agency, but as always, we remain dedicated to protecting public health and the environment for you. Apr 14, 2025 ... ... companies made the toxic chemicals or firefighting foam responsible for pollution. ... claims to those not involving AFFF contamination. May 22, 2024 ... -- Select Responsible Party --, Individual, Company ... Choose "No" to continue reporting a possible violation that is not an emergency. Jul 19, 2023 ... AGC is by no means solely responsible for PFAS pollution in the UK's watercourses. ... 82 against the company responsible for causing the ... 12 Facts on Columbia River Pollution Every day, thousands of pipes release pollution into the Columbia and its tributaries. As the lifeblood of the Pacific ... The natural resources affected or potentially affected by the release include, but are not limited to the following: freshwater fish, including the federally ... Apr 15, 2025 ... ... the company's chronic water pollution issues. “This is a severe abuse of the public trust. It simply isn't fair for one company not to play ... Oct 5, 2023 ... Schwalb said that while Pepco played a large role in the river's pollution, it isn't "solely responsible" – and should receive credit for ... The provincial governments are responsible for the regulation and supervision of all water resources, including rivers, that fall within their jurisdictions.